| TL;DR Most organisations pour time and budget into their EVP and career site, but lose candidates because the hiring experience behind them creates friction. Job seekers start on job boards, drop off at long forms, and judge employers on clarity, fairness and speed, not on brand messaging. The real EVP isn’t a tagline. It’s the experience people have when they apply. |
For years, companies have invested heavily in employer branding. New career sites, refreshed EVPs, elevated imagery, new taglines. These projects take months and cost six figures. Yet most candidates still begin their search on job boards, drop off before completing an application, and rarely return to a career site once they’ve clicked the “Apply” button.
It’s not that employer brand isn’t important. It’s that a great story cannot compensate for a hiring experience that feels slow, confusing or unfair. When candidates expect clarity and care, no EVP can shield a broken process.
Your struggling EVP isn’t a branding problem. It’s an experience problem.
Research shows that 92 percent of job seekers start on job boards, not career sites.¹ Even when organisations invest in beautiful pages, most candidates return to Indeed or Google to search again. If the next step is a long form, a CV upload, or a confusing flow, they leave. Appcast reports that mobile application drop-off can be as high as 80 percent in some industries.²
If you’re a consumer brand, this isn’t just a lost application. It’s a lost customer.
The gap isn’t caused by weak branding. It’s caused by a hiring experience that creates friction at every step. A slow process undermines trust. An inaccessible process excludes people. A confusing process makes the EVP feel irrelevant.
Traditional EVPs were built to communicate identity and aspiration. They helped organisations stand out in labour markets where differentiation mattered. But hiring and candidate expectations have shifted. Candidates place far more weight on fairness, clarity and speed than on messaging.
Recent data from Talent Board shows that candidate experience is now a stronger predictor of employer perception than employer brand assets.³ People believe what they encounter, not what they are told.
An EVP fails when the process feels misaligned. Promising belonging means little if the first step is a faceless form. Talking about care feels hollow if applicants wait weeks without hearing back. Positioning yourself as people-first rings untrue when the hiring flow feels transactional.
The challenge for recruitment marketers is no longer to craft the best story: it’s to design & measure the best experience.
Sapia.ai has analysed more than 8 million structured interviews across 50+ languages. What candidates consistently tell us is not abstract. It’s basic human need:
In our Humanising Hiring research, the average candidate satisfaction score across millions of interviews is 8.95 out of 10, with more than 80 percent leaving voluntary written feedback. They value the ability to communicate without pressure, to be assessed consistently, and to receive personalised insights, whether they progress or not.
This is what candidate trust looks like in practice.
The challenge isn’t the design of the site. It’s what happens after a candidate clicks “Apply”.
Most candidates enter your flow and are immediately funnelled into:
None of this supports the EVP or demonstrates what makes your organisation different. It is a series of hurdles that erodes trust.
Modern hiring needs something else. Not more content, but real guidance. Not more slogans, but signal. Candidates want help finding roles that match their strengths. They want to understand expectations. They want a process that feels designed with their experience in mind.
Focus less on the personality of your career site, and instead, consider the intelligent layers that make navigation easier, decisions clearer, and the experience more human.
If a process feels slow, arbitrary or biased, the EVP becomes meaningless. The true EVP is created in moments, not messages.
This is what shapes reputation – it’s what candidates talk about on Reddit. This is what determines whether they apply again, recommend your brand, or become a customer.
Across our customer base, where the hiring experience is redesigned with intelligence at the core, the impact is consistent:
These are EVP outcomes that matter. Measurable trust – far more valuable than taglines.
Not as the hero of the story, but as the infrastructure that supports a hiring experience candidates value.
Define Brilliant:
Jas™ helps organisations anchor roles to the traits, values and competencies that genuinely matter, and design an interview experience that reflects their brand.
Measure Brilliant:
Chat Interview offers structured, inclusive, untimed interviews that give every person a fair chance to express themselves, with validated, explainable scoring that hiring teams can trust, and personalised feedback for every candidate.
Discover Brilliant:
Discover Insights surfaces hidden talent and tracks fairness across the funnel.
We work with leading brands to create experiences that reflect the values they espouse through their EVP – and then we help them measure the outcomes.
A strong EVP still matters. But today, its strength comes from evidence. If your hiring experience gives people dignity, clarity and fairness, the EVP becomes real. If the experience is broken, the EVP is just noise.
The winners in 2026 will be those who design hiring journeys that earn trust at scale. Not through slogans, but through experience.
Your career site isn’t broken. Your candidates just want an experience they can believe in.