Advances in technology, shifts in workplace dynamics, and evolving employee expectations are reshaping the HR landscape. At the forefront of this transformation is the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including tools like ChatGPT, into the heart of HR practices. This integration raises questions about the role of organizational psychologists, and how embracing ethical AI to support people processes can foster a more dynamic, inclusive, and effective workplace.
The Urgent Need for Adaptation
Research indicates that up to 35% of job types could be replaced by machines within the next two decades, according to leading researchers from Oxford University and Deloitte. This statistic is not just a forecast, but an urgent call for organizational psychologists to explore new ways of coexisting and collaborating with this technology. It is undeniable that the practice of organizational psychology needs to adapt to this new landscape, and fast. As CHROs feel the pressure to adopt AI, the psychologists who advise them must be equipped with the knowledge and tools to help them make the right decisions about how AI is used in their people processes.
Acceptance and Flexibility: New Candidate & Employee Expectations
Employees and candidates crave flexibility, inclusivity, and personalized experiences. Traditional, top-down HR solutions fail to meet these needs, diminishing the returns that can be seen from continuing to invest in traditional HR tech stacks.
In contrast, AI offers a promising alternative, with generative AI tools like ChatGPT fundamentally changing how many of us work, learn, and stay productive. These tools enable a seismic shift from static, linear processes to conversational interactions that give individuals agency, empowering them and valuing their time.
The Role of Organizational Psychologists in an AI-enabled World
As AI becomes more prevalent in HR, organizational psychologists must augment their expertise with knowledge of the fundamentals of AI; as well as use their scientific knowledge to ensure that the AI that is being used, is responsible, ethical, and fit for purpose.
This involves understanding the science behind AI-powered tools, ensuring ethical application, and focusing on the development of systems that offer genuine value to both employees and organizations. There are three areas of impact in which organizational psychologists should already be playing a core role:
- Advocacy for Ethical AI: Just as org psychs ensure that traditional assessments or programs are responsible and ethical, now they should be championing the development and implementation of AI solutions that respect privacy, ensure fairness, and eliminate bias.
- Facilitating Human-AI Collaboration: The intersection of humans and AI is where the most exciting possibilities lie. AI can be used to enhance decision-making and productivity, without fully displacing the human element. Organizational psychologists must bring their expertise in designing these human-AI processes.
- Enhancing Employee Experience: It’s the goal of all HR departments to create personalized, flexible, and inclusive work environments that attract and retain top talent. AI can be used to help achieve these goals, and organizational psychologists should be up to date in their knowledge of which AI tools can help.
So, how can an organizational psychologist begin to equip themselves with this knowledge?
Understand the fundamentals of AI and how they’re being used in HR
Learn your MLs from your NLPS. This quick reference guide will help organizational psychologists understand a simple framework of AI terminology; and how each component can be used to optimize and enhance your HR processes.
Get acquainted with the concepts of Responsible AI
While the potential of AI is immense, organizational psychologists must also be aware of its limitations and ethical considerations. The reliance on AI must be balanced with human oversight to ensure accuracy, fairness, and the well-being of employees.
Ethical AI, and Responsible AI, they’re terms that are used a lot, however with no prior knowledge it can be difficult to know what makes an AI ‘ethical’ or ‘responsible’.
Responsible AI generally refers to the ethical, safe, trustworthy, and fair development, deployment, and use of AI systems. Ethically, the focus is on transparency, bias mitigation, accountability, privacy, accuracy, human oversight, safety, societal impact, and inclusivity. Legally, aspects such as regular audits, risk management, transparency notices, and thorough documentation stand out.
For organizational psychologists aiming to understand responsible AI use, this paper offers an overview and suggests seven essential questions to evaluate an AI solution.
Start with the business challenges
Many of us have fallen into the trap of building a business case to buy some new tech rather than building business cases around problems to be solved and then finding the right technology partner. When HR leaders start with the business problem, they measure their success in business metrics, not HR metrics.
Successful implementation of AI will start with the business challenges that need to be solved, and building a solution around that. Working with your stakeholders to ensure that any adoption of AI is centered on solving a real challenge will ensure the success of the project.
Consider how AI creates humanized experiences
Fundamentally, any new technology, AI or not, should enhance the experience of the user, whether that’s a candidate, employee, or hiring manager.
The rise of remote work and the demand for greater autonomy have clarified that connection is the new culture, and conversation is the new medium. Smart chat, powered by AI, is fundamentally different from basic chatbots. It learns from every interaction, providing personalized feedback and a human-like experience. This approach enhances engagement and fosters a culture of continuous learning and self-actualization.
Smart chat provides the opportunity for humanized experiences, at scale.
The future is here, it’s time to embrace it
As we stand on the brink of a new era in organizational psychology, it is clear that the future is conversational AI. Sapia.ai’s pioneering approach, which combines ethical AI with a deep understanding of human behavior, exemplifies how we can use technology to enhance our understanding of ourselves and others.
The role of the organizational psychologist is evolving, driven by the rapid advancements in AI and changing workplace dynamics. By embracing these changes, we can redefine what it means to work, lead, and succeed in the digital age. The future of work is here, and it’s conversational, inclusive, and intelligent.
Related
Blog
Sapia.ai Wrapped 2024
It’s been a year of Big Moves at Sapia.ai. From welcoming groundbreaking brands to achieving incredible milestones in our product innovation and scale, we’re pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in hiring.
And we’re just getting started 🚀
Take a look at the highlights of 2024
All-in-one hiring platform
This year, with the addition of Live Interview, we’re proud to say our platform now covers screening, assessing and scheduling.
It’s an all-in-one volume hiring platform that enables our customers to deliver a world-leading experience from application through to offer.
Supercharging hiring efficiency
Every 15 seconds, a candidate is interviewed with Sapia.ai.
This year, we’ve saved hiring managers and recruiters hours of precious time that can now be used for higher-value tasks.
Giving candidates the best experience
Our platform allows candidates to be their best selves, so our customers can find the people that truly belong with them. They’re proud to use a technology that’s changing hiring, for good.
Leading the way in AI for hiring
We’ve continued to push the boundaries in leveraging ethical AI for hiring, with new products on the way for Coaching, Internal Mobility & Interview Builders.
Blog
Situational Judgement Tests vs. AI Chat Interviews: A Modern Perspective on Candidate Assessment
Choosing the right tool for assessing candidates can be challenging. For years, situational judgement tests (SJTs) have been a common choice for evaluating behaviour and decision-making skills. However, they come with limitations that can make the hiring process less effective and less inclusive.
AI-enabled chat-based interviews, such as Sapia.ai, provide organisations with a modern alternative. They focus on understanding candidates as individuals and creating a hiring experience that is both fair and insightful while enabling efficient screening and selection.
This shift raises important questions: Are SJTs still a tool that should be considered for volume hiring? And what do AI assessments offer in comparison?
1. The Static Nature of SJTs
Traditional SJTs use predefined multiple-choice questions to assess behavioural tendencies and situational knowledge. While useful for screening, these static frameworks lack the flexibility to adapt based on real-world performance data or evolving role requirements.
Once created, SJTs don’t adapt to new data or evolving organisational needs. They rely on fixed scenarios and responses that may not fully reflect the dynamic realities of modern workplaces, and as a result, their relevance may diminish over time.
AI-enabled chat interviews, on the other hand, are inherently adaptive. Using machine learning, these tools can continuously refine their models based on feedback from real-world outcomes such as hiring or turnover data. This ability to evolve ensures the assessments align with organisations’ needs.
2. Richer Data Through Open-Ended Responses
One of the main critiques of SJTs is their reliance on multiple-choice responses. While structured and straightforward, these options may not capture the full scope of a candidate’s thinking, communication skills, or problem-solving ability. The approach is often limiting, reducing complex human behaviour to a few predefined choices.
AI-enabled chat interviews work more holistically and dynamically. These tools provide a more complete picture of a person by allowing candidates to answer questions in their own words. Natural language processing (NLP) analyses their responses, offering insights into personality traits, communication skills, and behavioural tendencies. This open-ended format lets candidates express themselves authentically, giving employers a deeper understanding of their potential.
3. The Candidate Experience: Stressful or Supportive?
SJTs often include time constraints and rigid formats, which can create pressure for candidates. This is especially true when candidates feel forced to choose options that don’t fully reflect how they would actually behave. The process can feel impersonal, even transactional.
In contrast, chat-based interviews are designed to be conversational and low-pressure for candidates. By removing time limits and adopting a familiar chat interface, these tools help candidates feel more at ease. They also frequently include personalised feedback, turning the assessment into a valuable experience for the candidate, not just the employer.
4. Addressing Bias and Fairness
Traditional SJTs are prone to transparency issues, as candidates can often identify and select the “best practice” answers without revealing their true tendencies. Additionally, static test designs can unintentionally embed bias; due to the nature of the timed test, SJTs have been found to disadvantage some groups.
AI chat interviews, when developed ethically within a framework like Sapia.ai’s FAIR Hiring Framework, eliminate explicit bias by relying solely on the content of a candidate’s responses. Their machine learning models are continuously validated for fairness, ensuring that hiring decisions are free from subjective judgments or irrelevant demographic factors.
5. An Assessment That Improves Over Time
Workplaces are constantly changing, and hiring tools need to keep up. SJTs’ fixed nature can make them less effective as roles evolve or organizational priorities shift. They provide a snapshot but not a dynamic view of what’s needed.
AI-enabled chat interviews are built to adapt. With feedback loops and continuous learning, they incorporate real-world hiring outcomes—like retention and performance data—into their models. This ensures that assessments stay relevant and effective over time.
Rethinking Candidate Assessment
As hiring demands grow more complex, so does the need for tools that can capture the whole person, not just their response to hypothetical scenarios. While SJTs have played an important role in hiring practices, they are increasingly being replaced by tools like AI-enabled chat interviews.
These modern approaches provide richer data, adapt to changing needs, and create a richer and more engaging experience for candidates. Perhaps most importantly, they emphasise fairness and inclusivity, aligning with the growing demand for unbiased hiring practices.
For organisations evaluating their assessment tools, the question isn’t just which method is “better.” Understanding the specific needs of your roles, teams, and candidates will help you choose tools that help you make decisions that are both informed and equitable.
Blog
Keeping Interviews Real with Next-Gen AI Detection
It’s our firm belief that AI should empower, not overshadow, human potential. While AI tools like ChatGPT are brilliant at assisting us with day-to-day tasks and improving our work efficiency, employers are increasingly concerned that they’re holding candidates back from revealing their true, authentic selves in online interviews.
As an assessment technology provider, we are responsible for ensuring the authenticity and integrity of our platform. That’s why we’re thrilled to unveil the latest upgrade to our flagship Chat Interview: the AI-Generated Content Detector 2.0. With groundbreaking accuracy and a candidate-friendly design, this innovation reinforces our mission to build ethical AI for hiring that people love.
Artificially Generated Content (AGC) is content created by an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Pi. We initially rolled out the first version of our AGC detector last year and have continued to improve it as our data set has grown and these AI tools have evolved.
What’s New?
Our updated AGC Detector 2.0 achieves an impressive 98% detection rate for AI-assisted responses, with a false positive rate of just 1%. This gives organisations peace of mind that they’re getting the most authentic assessment of every candidate.
This cutting-edge system builds on Sapia.ai’s proprietary dataset of over 2 billion words, derived from more than 20 million interview question-answer pairs spanning diverse roles, industries, and regions. It’s trained on real-world data collected before and after the release of tools like ChatGPT, ensuring it remains robust and reliable even as AI tools evolve.
The Challenge of AI in Chat-based Interviews
Our data shows that around 8% of candidates use tools like GPT-4 to generate responses for three or more interview questions. While these tools may offer a quick way for candidates to complete their interview, they can inadvertently hide a person’s true personality and potential – qualities our customers are most interested in understanding through our platform. In fact, research from Sapia Labs shows that these tools have their own personality traits, which may be quite different from the candidate applying for the role.
For Candidates: Enabling Authenticity
When a response is flagged as potentially AI-generated, the system doesn’t disqualify candidates. Instead, a real-time warning pops up, allowing them to revise their answers or submit them as-is. This ensures that candidates are encouraged to present themselves authentically, reflecting their unique communication styles and sharing their genuine experiences.
For Hiring Teams: Actionable Insights
Responses flagged as AI-generated are highlighted in the candidate’s Talent Insights profile, accessible via Sapia.ai’s Talent Hub or ATS integrations. These insights give hiring teams the transparency to make informed decisions, fostering trust while accelerating hiring timelines.
Built on Unmatched AI Interview Expertise
“Our detection model’s strength lies in its foundation of real-world interview data collected from diverse roles and regions,” says Dr Buddhi Jayatilleke, Sapia.ai’s Chief Data Scientist. This depth of understanding enables the AGC Detector to maintain its industry-leading accuracy – even when candidates subtly modify AI-generated answers to appear more human.
Why This Matters
The AGC Detector 2.0 embodies Sapia.ai’s commitment to ethical AI that amplifies human potential. As our CEO Barb Hyman explains:
“The hiring landscape has fundamentally changed since ChatGPT, but our commitment remains clear: AI should amplify human potential, not penalise it. This breakthrough fosters authentic hiring conversations. Our real-time warning system helps candidates make better choices and gives enterprises confidence in their selection decisions.”
Testing and Validation of the AGC Detector 2.0
The new detector has been rigorously tested on over 25,000 interview responses generated by humans and leading AI models like GPT-4, Claude-3.5, and Llama-3. The results speak for themselves, reinforcing the reliability and fairness of this game-changing technology.
Fairness & Transparency in AI-Enabled Hiring
By detecting AI-generated content while allowing candidates to correct their responses, our AGC Detector 2.0 ensures every applicant has the chance to put their best, most authentic foot forward when applying for a role powered by Sapia.ai. For enterprises, it provides confidence in the integrity of their hiring decisions and ensures they’re connecting with real candidates at scale.