Author: Buddhi Jayatilleke, Chief Data Scientist, Sapia.ai
We all know the value of company culture. Culture forms the shared values, beliefs, and practices that shape the behaviors and interactions of employees within an organization. It is like the collective personality of a company that shapes everything from employee satisfaction to customer experiences.
While culture is a collective outcome, it isn’t something that just happens automatically. Leaders are responsible for defining the underlying values and must remain intentional about sustaining the desired organizational culture. A key part of culture is who you hire and how you hire them. We hear phrases like “Culture Fit” and “Culture Add” in the hiring process. These are part of “who” you hire and are used to both accept and reject candidates. But “how” you hire reflects your culture and creates the virtuous (or vicious) cycle that amplifies (or derails) an organizational culture.
“If you hire people just because they can do a job, they’ll work for your money. But if you hire people who believe what you believe, they’ll work for you with blood and sweat and tears.” – Simon Sinek
The above quote, attributed to Simon Sinek, makes a great point, but how do you find people “who believe what you believe”? In other words, how do you attract and hire individuals who will thrive in and uplift your culture? The experience through the candidate’s journey plays a key role.
And today we have a new enabler. Artificial Intelligence (AI).
AI certainly can not create culture. Culture is innately a human construct. However, AI as a tool can help sustain, project, and amplify culture through effective engagement with employees and candidates. From job description writing to employee coaching, new generative AI tools, built on ethical principles, can help organizations instill their culture through sourcing to onboarding.
Here I highlight four key steps that leaders should pay attention to for building the right “hiring culture” and how AI can help. Due to my own experience in the selection process, more emphasis is placed there, but all 4 steps are equally important.
1. First Impressions Matter: The Job Description and Career Site
The job description is often the first interaction potential employees have with your organization. The language used, the values highlighted, and even the requirements listed can say a lot about your culture. For instance, emphasizing teamwork and collaboration suggests a culture valuing collective success over individual achievements. Using gender-neutral language can help attract a candidate pool that is gender diverse. These indicators give candidates an upfront understanding of what you prioritize and allow them to self-select based on fit.
Companies can enhance this first impression by providing more interactive means to get to know the organization rather than using static career websites filled with a lot of content. While some organizations do a great job in structuring the content and including more engaging content such as videos from existing employees, FAQ’s etc, these approaches fail to address questions a potential applicant might have in a timely manner. In a high-volume recruitment scenario, it is impossible to have human recruiters answer thousands of questions via phone or text chat.
This is where smart chatbots built on top of generative AI like Sapia.ai‘s Phai, a careers site assistant, can help. Phai can ingest all the relevant content on a website (or other sources) and then provide fast personalized responses to candidate queries, 24/. Phai not only enhances the experience but also increases the chances of a candidate completing the application process. Chat with Phai yourself by clicking the blue icon in the bottom right of your browser.
2. The Selection Process: What You Value in Candidates
The selection criteria and the selection process are reflections of what the organization values. Prioritizing skills over experience may indicate a culture that values continuous learning and potential. An interview is a common step in the selection process and most of the time it is unstructured and fraught with bias. We can all fall victim to various unconscious biases at this stage (and sometimes practice conscious ones too, unfortunately). As an example, here are 4 common ones that I have noticed in fast-paced growth environments like startups:
- Urgency bias: Rushed decisions to prioritize immediate needs over long-term goals when making hiring decisions. (We need to fill this role this week!)
- Confirmation bias: The tendency to interpret or favor information that confirms one’s preconceptions and ignore other relevant details. (This candidate comes from ABC Inc. They must be good!)
- Halo effect: Tendency to base an overall impression of a candidate on one positive trait or experience. (Wow! Their presentation slides looked amazing!)
- Dunning-Kruger effect: Individuals with limited skills or experience might overestimate their abilities in an interview and this overconfidence can sometimes be persuasive. Leaders who are inexperienced in a specific subject matter, for example, a non-technical founder who is recruiting an engineering manager, can be susceptible to this bias.
One way you can interrupt these human biases is to include an AI assistant in the process. This is where tools like Sapia.ai’s Chat Interview™ can help. Chat Interview™ conducts a chat-based structured interview that is scored by AI. Structured interviews are found to be high in validity and low in bias among the many options available to assess candidates. Hiring managers get access to a detailed report called Talent Insights (Ti) that can challenge some of their biased views and help them make better hiring decisions. For instance, independent research conducted using the Sapia.ai Chat Interview™ found a 36% reduction in the gender gap relative to recruitment without AI. One of the practices the Sapia.ai Chat Interview™ encourages is asking value-based interview questions to gauge alignment with company values. For example “Could you tell me about a time when you went above and beyond to help a team member at work?”.
3. Onboarding: The Introduction to Culture
The onboarding process is a critical stage for instilling organizational culture in new hires. Effective onboarding programs that align new employees with organizational values and expected behaviors can have a lasting impact on their integration and success within the company. As more companies become distributed and rely on remote work, part of company culture can be collaborating effectively over tools like wikis, and messaging apps like Slack and email. This requires making sure a new hire knows how to use these tools well and content norms specific to the company. This also brings to light the importance of “connection” as part of building culture, as in a remote work environment you have to be more intentional in building connections than when working together in an office. You can read more on this in “HR for the world of tomorrow“ where we discuss the changing landscape of work and how smart chat is the new medium for building connections.
4. Feedback and Continuous Improvement: Sustaining the Culture
How feedback is provided during the hiring process and the onboarding period can also be a cultural indicator. A culture that values growth and development is likely to provide constructive feedback to candidates (whether they are hired or not) and to new employees in an effective manner. This is the philosophy that Sapia.ai Chat Interview™ follows with My Insights, a feedback email every candidate gets after completing the chat interview that includes personality insights and coaching tips. The Sapia.ai Talent Insights report provides similar insights to the hiring managers that help them prepare for onboarding a new hire.
In essence, every aspect of the hiring process – from the job description to the final decision – is a reflection of your organizational culture. By being mindful of this, organizations can ensure they not only attract the right talent but also reinforce the culture they aspire to maintain and develop. AI can be used as a tool to mitigate biases, form a consistent process, and enhance the candidate experience to better reflect the company culture.
Related
Blog
Joe & the Juice Partners with Sapia.ai, Scaling an Exceptional Candidate Experience and Cutting Time to Hire
Read the full press release about the partnership here.
Joe & the Juice, the trailblazing global juice bar and coffee concept, is renowned for its vibrant culture and commitment to cultivating talent. With humble roots from one store in Copenhagen, now with a presence in 17 markets, Joe & The Juice has built a culture that fosters growth and celebrates individuality.
But, as their footprint expands, so does the challenge of finding and hiring the right talent to embody their unique culture. With over 300,000 applications annually, the traditional hiring process using CVs was falling short – leaving candidates waiting and creating inefficiencies for the recruitment team. To address this, Joe & The Juice turned to Sapia.ai, a pioneer in ethical AI hiring solutions.
A Fresh Approach to Hiring
Through this partnership, Joe & The Juice has transformed its hiring process into an inclusive, efficient, and brand-aligned experience. Instead of faceless CVs, candidates now engage in an innovative chat-based interview that reflects the brand’s energy and ethos. Available in multiple languages, the AI-driven interview screens for alignment with the “Juicer DNA” and the brand’s core values, ensuring that every candidate feels seen and valued.
Candidates receive an engaging and fair interview experience as well as personality insights and coaching tips as part of their journey. In fact, 93% of candidates have found these insights useful, helping to deliver a world-class experience to candidates who are also potential guests of the brand.
“Every candidate interaction reflects our brand,” Sebastian Jeppesen, Global Head of Recruitment, shared. “Sapia.ai makes our recruitment process fair, enriching, and culture-driven.”
Results That Matter
For Joe & The Juice, the collaboration has yielded impressive results:
-
33% Reduction in Screening Time: Pre-vetted shortlists from Sapia.ai’s platform ensure that recruiters can focus on top candidates, getting them behind the bar faster.
-
Improved Candidate Satisfaction: With a 9/10 satisfaction score from over 55,000 interviews, candidates appreciate the fairness and transparency of the process.
-
Bias-Free Hiring: By eliminating CVs and integrating blind AI that prioritizes fairness, Joe & The Juice ensures their hiring reflects the diverse communities they serve.
Frederik Rosenstand, Group Director of People & Development at Joe & The Juice, highlighted the transformative impact: “Our juicers are our future leaders, so using ethical AI to find the people who belong at Joe is critical to our long-term success. And now we do that with a fair, unbiased experience that aligns directly with our brand.”
Trailblazing for the hospitality industry
In an industry so wholly centred on people, Joe & the Juice is paving the way for similar brands to adopt technology that enables inclusive, human-first experiences that can reflect a brand’s core values.
If you’re curious about how Sapia.ai can transform your hiring process, check out our full case study on Joe & The Juice here.
Blog
Sapia.ai Wrapped 2024
It’s been a year of Big Moves at Sapia.ai. From welcoming groundbreaking brands to achieving incredible milestones in our product innovation and scale, we’re pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in hiring.
And we’re just getting started 🚀
Take a look at the highlights of 2024
All-in-one hiring platform
This year, with the addition of Live Interview, we’re proud to say our platform now covers screening, assessing and scheduling.
It’s an all-in-one volume hiring platform that enables our customers to deliver a world-leading experience from application through to offer.
Supercharging hiring efficiency
Every 15 seconds, a candidate is interviewed with Sapia.ai.
This year, we’ve saved hiring managers and recruiters hours of precious time that can now be used for higher-value tasks.
Giving candidates the best experience
Our platform allows candidates to be their best selves, so our customers can find the people that truly belong with them. They’re proud to use a technology that’s changing hiring, for good.
Leading the way in AI for hiring
We’ve continued to push the boundaries in leveraging ethical AI for hiring, with new products on the way for Coaching, Internal Mobility & Interview Builders.
Blog
Situational Judgement Tests vs. AI Chat Interviews: A Modern Perspective on Candidate Assessment
Choosing the right tool for assessing candidates can be challenging. For years, situational judgement tests (SJTs) have been a common choice for evaluating behaviour and decision-making skills. However, they come with limitations that can make the hiring process less effective and less inclusive.
AI-enabled chat-based interviews, such as Sapia.ai, provide organisations with a modern alternative. They focus on understanding candidates as individuals and creating a hiring experience that is both fair and insightful while enabling efficient screening and selection.
This shift raises important questions: Are SJTs still a tool that should be considered for volume hiring? And what do AI assessments offer in comparison?
1. The Static Nature of SJTs
Traditional SJTs use predefined multiple-choice questions to assess behavioural tendencies and situational knowledge. While useful for screening, these static frameworks lack the flexibility to adapt based on real-world performance data or evolving role requirements.
Once created, SJTs don’t adapt to new data or evolving organisational needs. They rely on fixed scenarios and responses that may not fully reflect the dynamic realities of modern workplaces, and as a result, their relevance may diminish over time.
AI-enabled chat interviews, on the other hand, are inherently adaptive. Using machine learning, these tools can continuously refine their models based on feedback from real-world outcomes such as hiring or turnover data. This ability to evolve ensures the assessments align with organisations’ needs.
2. Richer Data Through Open-Ended Responses
One of the main critiques of SJTs is their reliance on multiple-choice responses. While structured and straightforward, these options may not capture the full scope of a candidate’s thinking, communication skills, or problem-solving ability. The approach is often limiting, reducing complex human behaviour to a few predefined choices.
AI-enabled chat interviews work more holistically and dynamically. These tools provide a more complete picture of a person by allowing candidates to answer questions in their own words. Natural language processing (NLP) analyses their responses, offering insights into personality traits, communication skills, and behavioural tendencies. This open-ended format lets candidates express themselves authentically, giving employers a deeper understanding of their potential.
3. The Candidate Experience: Stressful or Supportive?
SJTs often include time constraints and rigid formats, which can create pressure for candidates. This is especially true when candidates feel forced to choose options that don’t fully reflect how they would actually behave. The process can feel impersonal, even transactional.
In contrast, chat-based interviews are designed to be conversational and low-pressure for candidates. By removing time limits and adopting a familiar chat interface, these tools help candidates feel more at ease. They also frequently include personalised feedback, turning the assessment into a valuable experience for the candidate, not just the employer.
4. Addressing Bias and Fairness
Traditional SJTs are prone to transparency issues, as candidates can often identify and select the “best practice” answers without revealing their true tendencies. Additionally, static test designs can unintentionally embed bias; due to the nature of the timed test, SJTs have been found to disadvantage some groups.
AI chat interviews, when developed ethically within a framework like Sapia.ai’s FAIR Hiring Framework, eliminate explicit bias by relying solely on the content of a candidate’s responses. Their machine learning models are continuously validated for fairness, ensuring that hiring decisions are free from subjective judgments or irrelevant demographic factors.
5. An Assessment That Improves Over Time
Workplaces are constantly changing, and hiring tools need to keep up. SJTs’ fixed nature can make them less effective as roles evolve or organizational priorities shift. They provide a snapshot but not a dynamic view of what’s needed.
AI-enabled chat interviews are built to adapt. With feedback loops and continuous learning, they incorporate real-world hiring outcomes—like retention and performance data—into their models. This ensures that assessments stay relevant and effective over time.
Rethinking Candidate Assessment
As hiring demands grow more complex, so does the need for tools that can capture the whole person, not just their response to hypothetical scenarios. While SJTs have played an important role in hiring practices, they are increasingly being replaced by tools like AI-enabled chat interviews.
These modern approaches provide richer data, adapt to changing needs, and create a richer and more engaging experience for candidates. Perhaps most importantly, they emphasise fairness and inclusivity, aligning with the growing demand for unbiased hiring practices.
For organisations evaluating their assessment tools, the question isn’t just which method is “better.” Understanding the specific needs of your roles, teams, and candidates will help you choose tools that help you make decisions that are both informed and equitable.