In volume hiring, few moments carry the weight of the in-person, or ‘live’ interview. It’s the first time a candidate and the hiring team meet face-to-face (virtually or in person), and it often serves as the deciding factor for both sides. But getting to that moment – and making it count – requires more than (often painfully) aligning calendars. It requires thoughtful preparation, seamless logistics, and the right candidates in the room.
At its core, the live interview is the moment of truth. After a candidate has gone through initial screening and shortlisting, this interview is where both the hiring team (often a time-poor hiring manager) and the candidate decide if the fit is right. Often disregarded as a simple Q&A, interviews are about connection, culture fit, and gauging future potential. A great interview can result in a long-term team member; a poor one can mean starting the search all over again. So, making sure the right people are in the interview is paramount.
Here’s why the live interview is such a critical piece of the hiring puzzle—and why we’ve designed our Live Interview Scheduling tool to optimise this stage of the volume hiring process:
Before anyone even steps into an interview room (or joins a video call), ensuring that the right candidates make it through the screening process is crucial. Otherwise, time and energy are wasted on candidates who don’t meet the role’s requirements or organizational values. With Sapia’s Chat Interview, we’ve created a way to deeply understand candidates’ traits, personalities, and potential fit through their language. This powerful, AI-driven tool replaces traditional CV screening with something far smarter and more insightful, ensuring only the most suitable candidates advance. Our asynchronous Video Interview tool enhances this process, enabling hiring managers to ‘meet’ the candidate first – to see how they communicate and learn more about them before they progress to the final stage.
Live Interview – our new interview scheduling tool – builds on this foundation. It ensures that candidates who are best suited for the role based on their earlier assessments can be seamlessly moved to this stage. This means less wasted time for hiring teams and a more respectful, efficient process for candidates.
The most common pain point in high-volume recruiting is the endless back-and-forth of scheduling interviews. Recruiters and hiring managers can spend hours coordinating availability, rescheduling due to conflicts, or juggling time zones. For both the recruiter and the candidate, it can feel like scheduling becomes a bigger obstacle than the interview itself.
Our Live Interview Scheduling Tool changes that. Built with AI-powered time slot generation and bulk scheduling, it takes the headache out of logistics. With just a few clicks, hiring teams can send interview invites, allowing candidates to book in at the optimal time while staying informed and engaged in the hiring process. This saves hours for recruiters and hiring managers and ensures that candidates stay connected and excited about the process before they meet you.
A great interview requires asking the right questions. By the time a candidate reaches the live interview stage, they’ve already demonstrated their capabilities and alignment with the role. Now, it’s about understanding their deeper fit with the team and culture. But too often, hiring managers come into interviews underprepared, relying on generic questions that don’t give them the full picture.
Our tool addresses this challenge head-on. Because it’s part of the Sapia.ai volume hiring platform, hiring teams are equipped with tailored insights into each candidate that are automatically generated from the Chat Interview. Interviewers can access customized questions that are specific to the candidate’s profile, making each interview more meaningful and productive. No more scrambling to find the right questions at the last minute—just purposeful conversations that drive better hiring decisions.
The interview process isn’t just a test for the candidate; it’s also an opportunity for them to evaluate the organization. Candidates need to be well-prepared, not just in terms of interview content, but also in terms of understanding the company’s values, culture, and the specific role they’re applying for. A candidate who feels prepared and aligned with your organization is more likely to make a positive decision if offered the role.
Our tool empowers candidates by sharing critical pre-interview information in advance—details about the role, the organization, its values, and what to expect during the interview process. This ensures that candidates walk into the interview ready, confident, and informed, making for a better interview experience for both sides.
Hiring should be a human experience, not a logistical nightmare. The live interview is one of the most important stages in the hiring funnel, and our Live Interview Scheduling Tool ensures that it’s as efficient, seamless, and thoughtful as possible.
From selecting the right candidates to optimizing the scheduling process, and ensuring both candidates and interviewers are well-prepared, we’ve taken the hassle out of interview logistics. With Live Interview, hiring teams can focus on what matters: building meaningful connections with candidates and hiring the best talent.
Are you ready to transform your live interview process?
Discover how Live Interview can save time, reduce frustration, and elevate the hiring experience for everyone involved. Schedule a demo today and experience the difference.
A new study has just confirmed what many in HR have long suspected: traditional psychometric tests are no longer the gold standard for hiring.
Published in Frontiers in Psychology, the research compared AI-powered, chat-based interviews to traditional assessments, finding that structured, conversational AI interviews significantly reduce social desirability bias, deliver a better candidate experience, and offer a fairer path to talent discovery.
We’ve always believed hiring should be about understanding people and their potential, rather than reducing them to static scores. This latest research validates that approach, signalling to employers what modern, fair and inclusive hiring should look like.
While used for many decades in the absence of a more candidate-first approach, psychometric testing has some fatal flaws.
For starters, these tests rely heavily on self-reporting. Candidates are expected to assess their own traits. Could you truly and honestly rate how conscientious you are, how well you manage stress, or how likely you are to follow rules? Human beings are nuanced, and in high-stakes situations like job applications, most people are answering to impress, which can lead to less-than-honest self-evaluations.
This is known as social desirability bias: a tendency to respond in ways that are perceived as more favourable or acceptable, even if they don’t reflect reality. In other words, traditional assessments often capture a version of the candidate that’s curated for the test, not the person who will show up to work.
Worse still, these assessments can feel cold, transactional, even intimidating. They do little to surface communication skills, adaptability, or real-world problem solving, the things that make someone great at a job. And for many candidates, especially those from underrepresented backgrounds, the format itself can feel exclusionary.
Enter conversational AI.
Organisations have been using chat-based interviews to assess talent since before 2018, and they offer a distinctly different approach.
Rather than asking candidates to rate themselves on abstract traits, they invite them into a structured, open-ended conversation. This creates space for candidates to share stories, explain their thinking, and demonstrate how they communicate and solve problems.
The format reduces stress and pressure because it feels more like messaging than testing. Candidates can be more authentic, and their responses have been proven to reveal personality traits, values, and competencies in a context that mirrors honest workplace communication.
Importantly, every candidate receives the same questions, evaluated against the same objective, explainable framework. These interviews are structured by design, evaluated by AI models like Sapia.ai’s InterviewBERT, and built on deep language analysis. That means better data, richer insights, and a process that works at scale without compromising fairness.
The new study, published in Frontiers in Psychology, put AI-powered, chat-based interviews head-to-head with traditional psychometric assessments, and the results were striking.
One of the most significant takeaways was that candidates are less likely to “fake good” in chat interviews. The study found that AI-led conversations reduce social desirability bias, giving a more honest, unfiltered view of how people think and express themselves. That’s because, unlike multiple-choice questionnaires, chat-based assessments don’t offer obvious “right” answers – it’s on the candidate to express themselves authentically and not guess teh answer they think they would be rewarded for.
The research also confirmed what our candidate feedback has shown for years: people actually enjoy this kind of assessment. Participants rated the chat interviews as more engaging, less stressful, and more respectful of their individuality. In a hiring landscape where candidate experience is make-or-break, this matters.
And while traditional psychometric tests still show higher predictive validity in isolated lab conditions, the researchers were clear: real-world hiring decisions can’t be reduced to prediction alone. Fairness, transparency, and experience matter just as much, often more, when building trust and attracting top talent.
Sapia.ai was spotlighted in the study as a leader in this space, with our InterviewBERT model recognised for its ability to interpret candidate responses in a way that’s explainable, responsible, and grounded in science.
Today, hiring has to be about earning trust and empowering candidates to show up as their full selves, and having a voice in the process.
Traditional assessments often strip candidates of agency. They’re asked to conform, perform, and second-guess what the “right” answer might be. Chat-based interviews flip that dynamic. By inviting candidates into an open conversation, they offer something rare in hiring: autonomy. Candidates can tell their story, explain their thinking, and share how they approach real-world challenges, all in their own words.
This signals respect from the employer. It says: We trust you to show us who you are.
Hiring should be a two-way street – a long-held belief we’ve had, now backed by peer-reviewed science. The new research confirms that AI-led interviews can reduce bias, enhance fairness, and give candidates control over how they’re seen and evaluated.
It’s time for a new way to map progress in AI adoption, and pilots are not it.
Over the past year, I’ve been lucky enough to see inside dozens of enterprise AI programs. As a CEO, founder, and recently, judge in the inaugural Australian Financial Review AI Awards.
And here’s what struck me:
Despite the hype, we still don’t have a shared language for AI maturity in business.
Some companies are racing ahead. Others are still building slide decks. But the real issue is that even the orgs that are “doing AI” often don’t know what good looks like.
The most successful AI adoption strategy does not have you buying the hottest Gen AI tool or spinning up a chatbot to solve one use case. What it should do is build organisational capability in AI ethics, AI governance, data, design, and most of all, leadership.
It’s time we introduced a real AI Maturity Model. Not a checklist. A considered progression model. Something that recognises where your organisation is today and what needs to evolve next, safely, responsibly, and strategically.
Here’s an early sketch based on what I’ve seen:
AI is a capability.And like any capability, it needs time, structure, investment, and a map.
If you’re an HR leader, CIO, or enterprise buyer, and you’re trying to separate the real from the theatre, maturity thinking is your edge.
Let’s stop asking, “Who’s using AI?”
And start asking: “How mature is our AI practice and what’s the next step?”
I’m working on a more complete model now, based on what I’ve seen in Australia, the UK, and across our customer base. If you’re thinking about this too, I’d love to hear from you.
For too long, AI in hiring has been a black box. It promises speed, fairness, and efficiency, but rarely shows its work.
That era is ending.
“AI hiring should never feel like a mystery. Transparency builds trust, and trust drives adoption.”
At Sapia.ai, we’ve always worked to provide transparency to our customers. Whether with explainable scores, understandable AI models, or by sharing ROI data regularly, it’s a founding principle on which we build all of our products.
Now, with Discover Insights, transparency is embedded into our user experience. And it’s giving TA leaders the clarity to lead with confidence.
Transparency Is the New Talent Advantage
Candidates expect fairness. Executives demand ROI. Boards want compliance. Transparency delivers all three.
Even visionary Talent Leaders can find it difficult to move beyond managing processes to driving strategy without the right data. Discover Insights changes that.
“When talent leaders can see what’s working (and why) they can stop defending their strategy and start owning it.”
What it is: The median time between application and hire.
Why it matters: This is your speedometer. A sharp view of how long hiring takes and how that varies by cohort, role, or team helps you identify delays and prove efficiency gains to leadership.
Faster time to hire = faster access to revenue-driving talent.
What it is: Satisfaction scores, brand advocacy measures, and unfiltered candidate comments.
Why it matters: Many platforms track satisfaction. Sapia.ai’s Discover Insights takes it further, measuring whether that satisfaction translates into employer and consumer brand advocacy.
And with verbatim feedback collected at scale, talent leaders don’t have to guess how candidates feel. They can read it, learn from it, and take action.
You don’t just measure experience. You understand it in the candidates’ own words.
What it is: The percentage of candidates who exit the hiring process at different stages, and how to spot why.
Why it matters: Understanding drop-off points lets teams fix friction quickly. Embedding automation early in the funnel reduces recruiter workload and elevates top candidates, getting them talking to your hiring teams faster.
Assessment completion benchmarks in volume hiring range between 60–80%, but with a mobile-first, chat-based format like Sapia.ai’s, clients often exceed that.
Optimising your funnel isn’t about doing more. It’s about doing smarter, with less effort and better outcomes.
What it is: The percentage of completed applications that result in a hire.
Why it matters: This is your funnel efficiency score. A high yield means your sourcing, screening, and selection are aligned. A low one? There’s leakage, misfit, or missed opportunity.
Hiring yield signals funnel health, recruiter performance, and candidate-process fit.
What it is: Insights into how candidate scores are distributed, and whether responses appear copied or AI-generated.
Why it matters: In high-volume hiring, a normal distribution of scores suggests your assessment is calibrated fairly. If it’s skewed too far left or right, it could be too hard or too easy, and that affects trust.
Add in answer originality, and you can track engagement integrity, protecting both your process and your brand.
To effectively lead, you need more than simply tracking; you need insights enabling action.
When you can see how AI impacts every part of your hiring, from recruiter productivity to candidate sentiment to untapped talent, you lead with insight, not assumption. And that’s how TA earns a seat at the strategy table.